Noah
Make an unfamiliar bargain feel safe, clear, and worth signing.
Noah — formerly Patch Homes — offers a debt-free way to tap home equity: it buys a share of your home instead of lending against it. My job on the Patch 3.0 marketing site was to make that genuinely novel bargain understandable fast enough that skepticism never won.
illustrative example values
Not a loan. An investment.
Most homeowners have more money locked in their house than anywhere else — and no good way to reach it that isn’t debt. Noah’s answer was to buy a share of the home instead of lending against it.
A monthly payment. An interest rate and an APR. A new lender with a claim on your home.
No monthly payment, no interest. Cash today for a share of future value. Noah wins only when your home does.
The catch was that there was no catch.
Homeowners arrived skeptical. “No monthly payment, no interest?” invites an instant second question: “So what happens to my house?” If the experience couldn’t answer faster than the doubt could set in, they’d leave — not because the product was bad, but because it was unexplained.
“This sounds too good to be true.”
“What’s the catch — and what happens to my home?”
Comprehension is the conversion.
Design the explanation, not just the page.
Explain in a headline
Convey “we buy a share of your home’s future” in the time it takes to read one line.
Reframe the absence
Make the lack of a monthly payment feel like relief, not a red flag.
Show the math, concretely
Spell out what Noah takes and what you keep if the home goes up, down, or flat.
Carry a nervous, high-stakes user through a commitment without ever losing them.
The Patch 3.0 marketing site.
An equity product can’t front-load an offer — it has to front-load understanding.The site was where that happened. Three pieces of work made it legible.
Flows & IA
Mapping who arrives, what they’re asking, and where each answer lives.
Site architecture
A page structure that meets complexity in the order people are ready for it.
Voice & copy
Plain language over jargon — because the words are where trust is won or lost.
Four homeowners, four questions.
New to Patch — “What even is this?”
Learn the model first.
Ready to act — “Will this work for me?”
Get an estimate.
On the fence — “Can I trust it?”
Success stories and eligibility.
Comparing — “Better than a HELOC?”
Side-by-side against debt.
Complexity, in the right order.
The whole path, before step one.
Financing shown as six plain steps — opening with a free estimate that won’t touch your credit, so the first move is reassurance, not risk.
Where the paperwork used to kill it.
The marketing site’s job ends the moment someone clicks Apply.But comprehension doesn’t help if the application itself strands them — and the hardest step is Documents, where you have to prove income, assets, and property. Chasing down tax returns and bank statements is exactly the friction that abandons a half-finished application. So the work carried into the flow: let people link a bank account instead of hunting for paperwork — Plaid embedded directly in the step, with manual upload kept only for the gaps.
Make the third-party step feel native
- Your Income
- Your assets
- Your property information
Left: Plaid’s default flow. Right: the same moment rebranded and set inside the application — so linking never feels like leaving.
- Your Income
- Your assets
- Your property information
- Your Income
- Your assets
- Your property information
- Your Income
- Your assets
- Your property information
- Your Income
- Your assets
- Your property information
Lorem ipsum sed lorem, ac non in Nam tempus, mauris. Id metus eu viverra. Massa Quisqua lorem ipsum sed lorem, ac non in Nam tempus.
- Your Income
- Your assets
- Your property information
Lorem ipsum sed lorem, ac non in Nam tempus, mauris. Id metus eu viverra. Massa Quisqua lorem ipsum sed lorem.
We are reviewing the supporting documents you submitted. We will post the final term sheet here when it is ready.
Application design work — the Documents step of the Patch loan flow. Wireframe fidelity; the linking modals rendered at higher detail.
The fully-designed endpoints.
Two screens carried the flow at full fidelity: the homeowner’s estimate — the moment the bargain becomes concrete — and the internal Document Vault that the linked accounts and uploads fed. Both shipped as part of Patch Homes.
The estimate page — offer, fee breakdown, and book-a-call in one scroll. (Scroll within the frame.)
The internal Document Vault — where the Plaid data and uploaded documents landed for the underwriting team.
Plain language does the heavy lifting.
Headlines led with the life, not the mechanism — “Make the most of owning a home,” “For wherever your home takes you,” “Discover what your house can do for you.” And the fear got answered head-on, in three plain promises:
Show the downside too.
$75,000 today for a 23% share. The honest version shows both futures — because hiding the loss would break the trust the product is built on.
Home goes up
Sells for more. Noah takes 23% of the gain — you keep the rest.
Home stays flat
You repay roughly what you took — no interest stacked on top.
Home goes down
Noah shares 23% of the loss too. You’re not alone on the way down.
Clarity and caution pull against each other.
…and you risk overwhelming a reader who’s already nervous.
…and it can feel evasive later — fatal for a trust product.
Fully honest and genuinely understandable — that balance was the craft.
In financial products, comprehension is the conversion.
When a product is genuinely novel, the interface’s first job isn’t to persuade — it’s to explain so well that persuasion becomes unnecessary. Plain language, an honest downside, and visible fairness aren’t decoration. On Noah, they were the product — and so was getting out of the way once someone was finally ready to act.